|





| |
Perinton-Fairport
Post June
27, 2002
What's
right, wrong with canal?
A
look back at the 10 years since New York canals changed management shows many
accomplishments, and many needs.
by
Benjamin Wachs
Messenger Post Staff
A
variety of canal users and government officials spoke their mind last week about
what has gone right and what has yet to be done with the Erie Canal.
They shared their views at a public forum
commemorating the 10th anniversary of the new administration of New York's canal
system.
The forum was sponsored by the State Council on
Waterways, a private, not-for-profit advocacy group dedicated to
revitalizing, preserving and promoting state waterways. This was one of six
canal-related forums that SCOW has sponsored across New York during the past
year.
In 1992, the state legislature transferred the
canal system from the state Department of Transportation, which had run the
system in one form or another since 1825, to the New York State Thruway
Authority.
SCOW President Thomas Ryan was with the DOT during
the 1980's, and emphasized at the forum that the change needed to be made.
"The canal had been used primarily for
recreation for a long time, and the government never made the switch," Ryan
said. "We were always waiting for the next barge to come through, and it
wasn't coming." Putting the canal system under the Thruway Authority, which
created the New York State Canal Corporation, allowed that change to take place.
Canal Corporation Director Bob Brooks said that it
made an enormous difference, both culturally and financially.
"It created a cultural change," Brooks
said. "It had still been a commercial waterway, and was resistant to
change. But the transfer enabled us to get a fresh start to sell the program
across the state."
In addition, more than 167 million dollars
"in hard cash" had been invested in the canal since the change, for
upkeep, marketing and promotions -- which Brooks said was the biggest difference
of all.
"We've come a long ways," he said.
"The days of discussion about closing the canal are long gone. We've built grass-roots
support from the ground up."
More is yet to come. Brooks said that the next
five-year plan for the canal from the governor's office involves spending more
than 50 million on the canal, and that the corporation intends to make the canal
trail the longest continuous recreational trail in the United States.
But, not everyone who spoke was so upbeat. Several
marina owners along the canal, including Judy Dean, co-owner of the
Schuylerville Yacht Basin, said that not enough support was given to the owners
of businesses that are the very first thing that a tourist visiting the canal is
likely to see.
"I always say that we are more you than you
are," said dean, referring to canal business owners. "We are the front
line in bringing people to the canal, and we're not getting enough
support."
In particular, Dean objected to the way in which
many municipalities are offering free docking and services that duplicate the
ones existing marinas offer for a fee, and said that more marketing efforts were
needed to being people to the canal.
Indeed, while there was a general agreement that
the infrastructure of the canals is in much better shape now than it had been 10
years ago, there was also a wide consensus that more, and better, marketing
efforts were needed to make the canal a major attraction.
"It's very important that we reach the youth
across the United States and Canada," said Fairport Mayor Clark King.
"That's the marketing we used to do."
But, despite some complaints, the sense of
progress was palpable. Ted Curtis, the founder of Corn Hill Navigation in
Rochester, recalled how prior to the Thruway taking over, "European
visitors would ask 'Can I take a ride on the Erie Canal?' and the answer was
'No, you can't," because there weren't enough boats or facilities.
That has changed. But Curtis had one request:
"What do we want for the canal? We want more."
| |

|

|
|
Places of Interest on
SCOW.Net:
|
|

|
|